Menon" de Platon. Platon, philosophe grec, eleve de Socrate (427- 347 av JC).

Ménon

Le Second Hippias ou L'Hippias mineur (ou Sur le Mensonge) est un dialogue de Platon. Il appartient � la s�rie dite des Premiers Dialogues, compos�s � l'�poque o� l'auteur �tait encore jeune. La date de la r�daction exacte reste cependant incertaine. Ce dialogue traite de la tromperie.Le grand sophiste Hippias d'�lis est de passage � Ath�nes chez son h�te Eudicos. Il vient de faire un grand honneur � ce dernier en pronon�ant chez lui, et devant de nombreux spectateurs, dont Socrate, une ample dissertation portant sur l'oeuvre d'Hom�re.Chacun y �tant all� de son compliment une fois l'expos� termin�, Eudicos s'interroge sur l'attitude de Socrate, lequel reste myst�rieusement silencieux. Est-ce simple exc�s de timidit�, ou faut-il l'interpr�ter comme un d�saccord avec les paroles d'Hippias?Mais Socrate tient � rassurer Eudicos: il a �cout� avec grand int�r�t les commentaires du savant homme sur l'Iliade et l'Odyss�e, et s'il n'a jusqu'� pr�sent pas os� poser les nombreuses questions lui �tant venues � l'esprit, c'�tait par peur de para�tre importun devant tout ce monde. Mais maintenant que les voil� tranquilles tous les trois, Hippias ne refusera certainement pas d'engager la conversation.

Le Second Hippias, Ou Du Mensonge

Awaiting his trial on charges of impiety and heresy, Socrates encounters Euthyphro, a self-proclaimed authority on matters of piety and the will of the gods. Socrates, desiring instruction in these matters, converses with Euthyphro, but as usual, the man who professes to know nothing fares better than the man who claims to be an expert. One of Plato’s well-known Socratic Dialogues, Euthyphro probes the nature of piety, and notably poses the so-called Euthyphro Dilemma: Do the gods love a thing because it is holy, or is a thing holy because it is loved by the gods?

Euthyphron

Philebe" de Platon. Platon, philosophe grec, eleve de Socrate (427- 347 av JC).

Philèbe

Trieste Publishing has a massive catalogue of classic book titles. Our aim is to provide readers with the highest quality reproductions of fiction and non-fiction literature that has stood the test of time. The many thousands of books in our collection have been sourced from libraries and private collections around the world.The titles that Trieste Publishing has chosen to be part of the collection have been scanned to simulate the original. Our readers see the books the same way that their first readers did decades or a hundred or more years ago. Books from that period are often spoiled by imperfections that did not exist in the original. Imperfections could be in the form of blurred text, photographs, or missing pages. It is highly unlikely that this would occur with one of our books. Our extensive quality control ensures that the readers of Trieste Publishing's books will be delighted with their purchase. Our staff has thoroughly reviewed every page of all the books in the collection, repairing, or if necessary, rejecting titles that are not of the highest quality. This process ensures that the reader of one of Trieste Publishing's titles receives a volume that faithfully reproduces the original, and to the maximum degree possible, gives them the experience of owning the original work.We pride ourselves on not only creating a pathway to an extensive reservoir of books of the finest quality, but also providing value to every one of our readers. Generally, Trieste books are purchased singly - on demand, however they may also be purchased in bulk. Readers interested in bulk purchases are invited to contact us directly to enquire about our tailored bulk rates.

Platon; Oeuvres Complètes; Tome V - 2e Partie

Dans l'Hippias mineur, Platon fait intervenir Socrate sur l'un des terrains de predilection de la sophistique: l'exegese d'Homere. Ulysse, le heros a double face, est un menteur ruse. Socrate le prend pour exemple et interroge sur son compte le sophiste Hippias: qu'est-ce qui permet a quelqu'un de dire le faux, de mentir et de tromper? Celui qui ment et trompe ne doit-il pas son aptitude, sa puissance, a la connaissance de la verite qu'il contrefait volontairement? C'est la question, ethique, de l'Hippias mineur: n'est-ce pas celui qui connait le bien qui est le plus susceptible de faire le mal? Platon repond par la negative, pour discrediter la confusion des arguments ethiques sophistiques et mettre en cause la pertinence des modeles homeriques.

Hippias Mineur

4e de couverture :Platon n'est pas idéaliste comme on le dit. Le monde de Platon n'est nullement un songe : au contraire, dur comme le diamant et toujours le même. C'est notre vie qui est un songe ; car nos souvenirs sont des ombres pâles. Alaintraduction et note de R. BACCOU

La République

The Apology is Plato's version of the speech given by Socrates as he defended himself in 399 BCE against the charges of "corrupting the young, & by not believing in the gods in whom the city believes, but in other daimonia that are novel" (24b). "Apology" here has its earlier meaning (now usually expressed by the word "apologia") of speaking in defense of a cause or of one's beliefs or actions (from the Ancient Greek ἀπολογία). The Apology can be divided into three parts. The 1st is Socrates' own defense of himself & includes the most famous parts of the text, namely his recounting of the Oracle at Delphi & his cross-examination of Meletus. The 2nd part is the verdict. The 3rd part is the sentencing.

Apologie de Socrate

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.

Ménon

Résumé

Plus de livres de Plato

Critiques

Ce livre n'a pas encore de critiques