Scripta didactica et polemica - Volume 4, Epistolae duae (1537) Deux discours (octobre 1536)

Jean Calvin

Publié par Librairie Droz, le 01 janvier 2009

243 pages

Résumé

These two public letters are Calvin's first publication for a wider audience since his arrival in Geneva. Its preface is dated on 12 January 1537. After years of scholarly activity and travelling in anonymity Guillaume Farel forcefully committed him to the church of Geneva. The young author of the Institutes (1536) was at Farel's and Viret's side at the Disputation of Lausanne. He broke any allegiance with the Circle of Meaux and sided wholeheartedly with the reformed cause. The contents of the Epistolae duae, drafted in Ferrara, reveal that Calvin must have revised the manuscript to give testimony to the appeal of the Disputation to the roman catholic clergy. The first letter challenges Christians to break away for idolatry and confess publicly. The second letter is a challenge to the clergy either to reform or lay down their offices. The Epistolae duae are the opening move in the exchange among the reformers on nicodemism. Calvin, as ghost writer of Farel, breaks with the reform movement of Meaux, France. That was what the reformed position in October 1536 had implied. Calvin's two minor contributions to the Disputation of Lausanne have been added to the present edition.

L'institution de la religion chretienne. livre iv

Opera exegetica - Volume 15, Commentarii in secundam Pauli epistolam ad Corinthios

In evangelium secundum Johannem Commentarius. Pars altera. Series II, Opera exegetica

Commentaires sur le Nouveau Testament - Tome 2, Evangile selon saint Jean

Leçons sur les Lamentations de Jérémie - Praelectiones in Lamentationes Jeremiae

De aeterna Dei praedestinatione - De la prédestination éternelle. Series III. Scripta ecclesiastica

Scripta didactica et polemica - Volume 2, Brieve instruction pour armer tous bons fideles contre les erreurs de la secte commune des anabaptistes

Commentaires bibliques - Tome 6, Epîtres aux Galates, Ephésiens, Philippiens et Colossiens

Critiques