L'Étude économique de l'OCDE : Finlande 2012 examine les développements économiques récents, la politique et les perspectives de ce pays ; comment relancer la croissance économique. Ce rapport fournit une analyse détaillée du système de santé de la Finlande.

Études économiques de l'OCDE : Finlande 2012

Ce rapport fournit un aperçu des efforts réalisés par les pays, qui à travers la réglementation, promeuvent la concurrence et stimulent l'innovation sur les marchés de la communication. Il examine également les questions relatives aux marchés de radiodiffusion, aux infrastructures internet, aux dépenses de communication, à l'usage des ménages et des entreprises et aux tendances des échanges dans les services de télécommunications. Il montre que le secteur des communications a fait preuve de résilience durant la crise financière mondiale (CFM), reflétant ainsi son rôle crucial dans les économies d'aujourd'hui.

Perspectives des communications de l'OCDE 2013

Invention et transfert de technologies environnementales

This report contains Phase 1 and Phase 2 Global Forum Peer Reviews for Denmark, now incorporating Phase 2 ratings.

The Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes is the multilateral framework within which work in the area of tax transparency and exchange of information is carried out by 120 jurisdictions, which participate in the Global Forum on an equal footing.

The Global Forum is charged with in-depth monitoring and peer review of the implementation of the international standards of transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes. These standards are primarily reflected in the 2002 OECD Model Agreement on Exchange of Information on Tax Matters and its commentary, and in Article 26 of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital and its commentary as updated in 2004. The standards have also been incorporated into the UN Model Tax Convention.

The standards provide for international exchange on request of foreseeably relevant information for the administration or enforcement of the domestic tax laws of a requesting party. Fishing expeditions are not authorised but all foreseeably relevant information must be provided, including bank information and information held by fiduciaries, regardless of the existence of a domestic tax interest or the application of a dual criminality standard.

All members of the Global Forum, as well as jurisdictions identified by the Global Forum as relevant to its work, are being reviewed. This process is undertaken in two phases. Phase 1 reviews assess the quality of a jurisdiction's legal and regulatory framework for the exchange of information, while Phase 2 reviews look at the practical implementation of that framework. Some Global Forum members are undergoing combined - Phase 1 and Phase 2 - reviews. The Global Forum has also put in place a process for supplementary reports to follow-up on recommendations, as well as for the ongoing monitoring of jurisdictions following the conclusion of a review. The ultimate goal is to help jurisdictions to effectively implement the international standards of transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes.

All review reports are published once approved by the Global Forum and they thus represent agreed Global Forum reports.

For more information on the work of the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes, and for copies of the published review reports, please refer to www.oecd.org/tax/transparency and www.eoi-tax.org.

Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes Peer Reviews: Denmark 2013

This third edition of Health at a Glance: Europe presents a set of key indicators related to health status, determinants of health, health care resources and activities, quality of care, access to care, and health expenditure and financing in 35 European countries, including the 28 European Union member states, four candidate countries and three EFTA countries. The selection of indicators is based largely on the European Core Health Indicators (ECHI) shortlist, a set of indicators that has been developed to guide the reporting of health statistics in the European Union. This is complemented by additional indicators on quality of care, access to care and health expenditure, building on the OECD expertise in these areas. Compared with the previous edition, this third edition includes a greater number of ECHI indicators, reflecting progress in the availability of comparable data in the areas of non-medical determinants of health and access to care. It also includes a new chapter dedicated to access to care, including selected indicators on financial access, geographic access and timely access.

Health at a Glance : Europe 2014

Many of the recent concerns about food security relate to perceived threats to current levels of food security, such as those due to price shocks or natural disasters. These threats concern the risk of food insecurity. This publication develops a risk-management tool to examine the robustness of policy responses to managing risks and uncertainty across a variety of different threats to food security, and applies the framework to an Indonesia case study. Five risk scenarios were selected as major threats to food security in Indonesia, following a consultation process among stakeholders and policy makers, and assessed in terms of existing and alternative agricultural and social policies. The risk assessment shows that domestic economic and natural disaster scenarios are more important than global price hikes and that a policy strategy that concentrates on addressing a single source of risk, such as a price spike in international markets, may increase vulnerability to other sources of risk such as domestic crop failure. The analysis yields a number of specific policy recommendations, including targeting of social assistance programme using food vouchers or cash transfers.

Managing food insecurity - Risk-analytical framework and application to Indonesia

With procurement accounting for 13% of GDP and a third of government expenditures on average in OECD countries, investing in appropriate processes to mitigate risks of waste and corruption leads to efficiency gains considering the financial stakes. In 2008 OECD countries committed to promoting transparency, integrity, good management as well as accountability in procurement with the adoption of the OECD Recommendation on Enhancing Integrity in Public Procurement. This assessment of progress made in OECD countries shows that as a result of austerity measures governments have been under tight budgetary constraints to provide smarter procurement, that is better service delivery at lower cost. Because environmental protection has become a growing societal imperative, the review of progress made shows that there is a strong political push in OECD countries to integrate environmental considerations in procurement. With the economic crisis, some governments have been tempted to use procurement to ease its socio-economic impact on societies by providing a substitute for direct social policies to support employment for specific communities. However few governments have invested in prioritising the objectives pursued through procurement, assessing their costs or benefits, and measuring their actual impact.

Implementing the OECD Principles for Integrity in Public Procurement  / Progress since 2008

Cette publication contient des statistiques sur les pêcheries dans les pays de l'OCDE (à l'exception de l'Autriche) et dans quelques économies non-membres (Argentine, République populaire de Chine, Colombie, Indonésie, Lettonie, Lituanie, Pérou, Fédération de Russie, Afrique du Sud, Taipei chinois, Thaïlande) de 2007 à 2014. Les données fournies concernent la capacité de la flotte de pêche, l'emploi dans les pêcheries, les débarquements de poisson, la production aquacole, la pêche récréative, les transferts financiers publics, et les importations et exportations de poisson.

Examen de l'OCDE des pêcheries : statistiques nationales (édition 2015)

Pourquoi certaines régions ont-elles une croissance plus rapide que d'autres qui ne se conforme pas toujours aux théorieséconomiques ? Celles-ci sont des questions centrales dans le climatéconomique actuel oùles décideurs cherchent des moyens pour stimuler une nouvelle croissance durable. L'analyse de l'OCDE suggère qu'il n'y a pas de modèle unique pour la politique régionale et donc les manières par lesquelles les régions se développent sont très variées. Pour assurer une croissanceàlong terme ce n'est pas suffisant de concentrer les ressources au bon endroit. S'appuyant sur des travaux récents de l'OCDE, notamment sur une analyse de données régionales, des examens des politiques et desétudes de cas, ce rapport soutient que ce sontàla fois la façon dont les investissements sont réalisés, les atouts régionaux utilisés et les synergies exploitées qui vont déterminer les différences entre régions. L'investissement public doit faire des priorités sur les impacts de la croissance de la productivitéàplus long terme et associer les mesures de façon intégrée. Ceci souligne l'importance des régions et de la politique régionale dans la croissanceéconomique et encourage une nouvelle approche des réformeséconomiques.

Études économiques de l'OCDE : Finlande 2012

Résumé

Plus de livres de OCDE

Critiques

Ce livre n'a pas encore de critiques