Coal - Medium-term Market report

Publié par OCDE, le 17 juin 2015

132 pages

Résumé

The Medium-Term Coal Market Report 2014 provides IEA forecasts on coal markets for the coming five years as well as an in-depth analysis of recent developments in global coal demand, supply and trade. The fourth annual report shows that, while China will continue to dominate global coal markets between now and the end of the decade, India and Southeast Asia will also drive coal demand growth, although on a smaller scale. Despite coal’s reputation as an old-fashioned, 19th-century fuel, coal markets today are very dynamic: a variety of qualities are traded, new price indexes have been created for different qualities in different regions and an increasing amount of paper trading is taking place. Meanwhile, physical flows of coal are quite sensitive to demand and price developments – not to mention policy changes throughout the world. This report examines whether and when China’s efforts to diversify its energy mix – the so-called ABC (anything but coal) policy – will lead to peak demand for coal in the world’s biggest coal market. It also analyses how the current environment of low prices for coal will affect not just demand and investments but also the ability of coal producers to stay in business, and how new regulations in the main importing and exporting countries may affect international trade.

Innovation policy in Panama ; design, implementation and evaluation

External debt statistics : 1998-2002 : statistiques de la dette exterieure : 1998-2002

Statistiques de l'OCDE sur les échanges internationaux de services : OECD Statistics on international trade in services 1992-2001

Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes Peer Reviews : Barbados 2014

Statistiques de l'OCDE sur l'investissement direct international 2012

Harmoniser l'aide pour renforcer son efficavcité - Document sur les bonnes pratiques, une référence du CAD

OECD economic surveys : Belgium 2015

Purchasing power parities and real expenditures

Critiques